American Politics Placement Candidates
Jeremy Castle’s research examines how non-governmental institutions, such as religion and the media, influence public opinion. His dissertation, "Rock of Ages: Subcultural Religious Identity and Public Opinion Among Young Evangelicals," seeks to solve a puzzle: While political scientists typically find that evangelicals hold conservative attitudes, recent popular accounts suggest that this politically important group is becoming more liberal. Jeremy puts forth a subcultural theory of public opinion among young evangelicals and tests this theory using nationally representative survey data, 50 semi-structured interviews with college-age evangelicals at five universities, and an original panel survey of college-age evangelicals. He shows that the evangelical religious tradition possesses the ability to insulate members from trends in public opinion, provided that (a) the political issue in question is directly related to the core values of the evangelical tradition, and (b) individuals attend evangelical churches frequently and are otherwise "immersed" in the evangelical culture.
Jeremy's other research also examines the roots of public opinion. Jeremy and fellow graduate student Todd Adkins recently published their paper, "Moving Pictures?: Experimental Evidence of Cinematic Influence on Political Attitudes" in Social Science Quarterly.
Jeremy is committed to teaching excellence and has taught at both the University of Notre Dame (where he led a senior seminar on Campaigns and Elections) and Hanover College (where he directs the summer Pre-Law Institute for high school students). He regularly makes use of active learning strategies, including debates, mock trials, and presentations, in order to improve student participation and learning outcomes. He looks forward to teaching courses in the areas of American politics, research methodology, and public law.
Christopher Weaver is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Political Science, specializing in the study of American politics and constitutional studies.
His research and teaching interests encompass a range of topics within these fields, including the study of political behavior, constitutional law and jurisprudence, religion and politics, and identity politics. His dissertation examines the role of moral psychology in political decision-making, and his broader work examines the role of religion in the political lives of marginalized groups (including elites such as judges and party activists), exploring the ways in which religion both mitigates and exacerbates inequality across multiple dimensions, including race and ethnicity, class, and gender. His work has been published or is forthcoming in Politics and Religion and Law & Society Review.
In his dissertation, entitled " 'Knowing' Right from Wrong: The Role of Moral Confidence in Political Decision-Making," he examines individuals' moral judgments and legal opinions on the issues of abortion, homosexuality, capital punishment, and physician-assisted suicide. Using preexisting and original survey data, he contends that moral judgments and legal opinions on moral issues are distinct but related, and that variation in moral confidence, or an individual’s perceived level of moral knowledge, helps explain this morality-legality gap in opinion. Moreover, he argues that many individuals are morally overconfident, which drives them to more readily apply their moral judgments to policy issues and take more extreme legal stances on these moral issues. Leverage data collected in an original survey experiment, however, he shows that this moral overconfidence can be reduced, resulting in greater support for legalization of these issues.
A first-generation college student born and raised in Arkansas, Chris earned his B.A. in Politics in 2011 from Hendrix College in Conway, Arkansas prior to coming to Notre Dame.
Graduation anticipated Spring 2016.